Cruz makes a fool out of a warmer....

http://www.weaselzippers.us/236157-cruz-in-full-gear-ted-shows-sierra-club-president-knows-nothing-about-global-warming/

It's actually painful to watch or listen to the (obviously public educated) witness. His belief in the 97% is truly laughable and sad. Jeez how many times did he refer to the ((97), 14 times?

That he looked like a buffoon is not important.

He trotted out the company line enough times that even the stupidest LIV will remember it.

To realize that about half the country is that dumb is terrifying.

Well, if a person is average, half the people with whom that person will interact will be dumber than that person. And it will be painfully obvious. As everyone here already knows.

I know I know... I'm drinking Spaten Optimator tonight.

Harv

And you....

will still have an IQ 4 times higher than that dissipated sack.

Well, that wouldn't necessarily hafta be a whole number, but it might help the 97% settled science worshippers' "pagan" realist peers explain to them how basic math worked before common core.

As hard as leftists work to retain their beliefs in the face of logic, the work they put in day in and day out, if they only knew or were willing to accept the results of basic logic, how linear and clear and easy life would become.   Yet they prefer to contradict their own spoken beliefs by their actions.  Actions which don't mimic nature's successes around them.  Take capitalism.  Most people think of capitalism as a purely human interaction of economy.  That we humans somehow developed currencies out of whole cloth and there is no example of it in nature.  Currencies represent units of property.  Property is defined by boundaries.  Boundaries encompass territories.  Any of these terms are used interchangeably to describe ownership of things.  In nature animals defend their territories based upon instinct, while we recognize they must do it at least somewhat to protect a food source.  Or owning mating rights.  That sort of thing.

Leftist thinking eliminates private property.  Imagining a false dichotomy is somehow able to exist in a world whose nature contradicts the idea of a commune.  In nature there is a king.  A queen.   There is a hierarchy.  In human nature there is mutual agreement either by force or by consent.  But rarely is there each by his ability and each according to his need.  And in those moments, only existing as an experimental stage.  One never sees such social justice structures flourishing on their own.  They can't.  They aren't natural to nature.

If all the tenets in the sphere of globalism (pardon the pun) were functional, mankind would have to be omnipresent.  We'd have to exist as a part of every society, all the time, at the same time.  Just shipping us products from around the world cannot be correctly labeled as capitalism since when we trade with some nations who can provide us the same goods at lower prices as other nations, or our own, then we necessarily raise the conditions of the company owners in the cheaper markets and eventually destroy all the others.  You end up with a monopoly based upon price, not quality or labor conditions.  



Harv