Why Would Romney Say Obama Supporters Feel “Entitled” To Free Stuff?

http://weaselzippers.us/2012/09/18/why-would-romney-say-obama-supporters-feel-entitled-to-free-stuff/

You know what's reeeeeeeeaaaally interesting? That this socialist must enter into an implied agreement with his constituents based upon the the proven economic vehicle captialism;

You do this for me, I'll do that for you.

The problem is, you can't make socialism work just by having it ride the coattails of capitalism. You can't cite an implied agreement unless you have the wherewithal to uphold your end of the bargain or deal. That's where the socialist always loses. The socialist is always attempting to borrow goods and services off the backs of the producers in a given society. First by conviction through charity, later by conviction through arbitrary law (which contradicts natural law and thus always fails in the end).

The best part is, capitalism always boils through. Economics aren't governed by a currency unless that currency is backed by a govt which also taxes it's citizens. At first the reasons are entirely justifyable. Later they are used for the protection of the govt itself.

But back to the point. Capitalism begins with barter. True capitalism is a condition where equal values of properties are privately traded. One person needs X more than Y. On the other side of the table, Y is needed more than X. And the values are always determined by the individuals involved directly in the barter.

Ask yourself this: Does the individual exist without a govt?

Does a govt exist without individuals?

More on this later

Harv