Neil Gorsuch has set SCOTUS on fire.
Page 1 of 1
Neil Gorsuch has set SCOTUS on fire.
Interesting.
>
> May 3, 2017
>
> Neil Gorsuch hasn't even been a Supreme Court Justice for a full month now and already he is setting fires everywhere.
> Today the young justice reignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he REFUSED to join the SCOTUS "cert pool."
> So how big is this "cert pool"? Well, according to the Daily Caller, the
> cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term.
> In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court's law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial.
> The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices.
> It also, in theory, allows 3rd
> parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
> That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate.
> So, to sum it up for ya, Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in
> the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the
> discretion of legal clerks.
>
> This is the kind of story everyone should be sharing,. It shows how important our Constitution is and proves Trump does make great decisions.
> Will you help him getting this to your family and friends?
>
> May 3, 2017
>
> Neil Gorsuch hasn't even been a Supreme Court Justice for a full month now and already he is setting fires everywhere.
> Today the young justice reignited the fire of liberty and broke 40 years of precedent when he REFUSED to join the SCOTUS "cert pool."
> So how big is this "cert pool"? Well, according to the Daily Caller, the
> cert pool was established in 1973 during the early days of the Burger Court, in order to efficiently review the near 8,000 petitions received each term.
> In practice, the petitions are apportioned among the Court's law clerks, who then circulate a memo to the justices recommending a grant or denial.
> The obvious problem here is that this gives the power in these 8000 cases to the law clerks instead of the Justices.
> It also, in theory, allows 3rd
> parties to unfairly influence a case through the clerks.
> That is NOT how the Supreme Court was designed to operate.
> So, to sum it up for ya, Neil Gorsuch just managed to set his foot down in
> the Supreme Court and say it is NOT okay to pass off judgments to the
> discretion of legal clerks.
>
> This is the kind of story everyone should be sharing,. It shows how important our Constitution is and proves Trump does make great decisions.
> Will you help him getting this to your family and friends?
fortuna- Posts : 1365
Join date : 2016-01-10
Location : armpit state & Florida
Similar topics
» For those happyy about the SCOTUS decision on the travel ban
» New York's 'SAFE' Act: The 'Rape' of the Second Amendment
» Fire Ants & what to do.
» SYRIA RELEASES PHOTO OF DEAD AMERICAN – Assad Regime Kills American Nicole Lynn Mansfield
» Is it time to fire this idiot yet?
» New York's 'SAFE' Act: The 'Rape' of the Second Amendment
» Fire Ants & what to do.
» SYRIA RELEASES PHOTO OF DEAD AMERICAN – Assad Regime Kills American Nicole Lynn Mansfield
» Is it time to fire this idiot yet?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum